The Science Forum - Scientific Discussion and Debate  
 
 Live Chat    FAQ    Search    Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
Science Forum Forum Index » Engineering & Transportation » How good are the best robotic hands these days?

  
 How good are the best robotic hands these days? « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
kojax
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 10:01 pm    Post subject: How good are the best robotic hands these days? Reply with quote

Forum Ph.D.
Forum Ph.D.

Joined: 27 Mar 2007
Posts: 713

I'm just curious. I know NASA has a robonaut with pretty decent hands that that use tiny electric motors mounted in the wrists. And there's this company called Shadow that makes a hand driven by compressed air valves mounted in the wrist.

Anyone know of any other good ones?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wolf
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 12:57 pm    Post subject: Re: How good are the best robotic hands these days? Reply with quote

Forum Lycanthrope

Joined: 15 May 2007
Posts: 1014
Location: Here

kojax wrote:
I'm just curious. I know NASA has a robonaut with pretty decent hands that that use tiny electric motors mounted in the wrists. And there's this company called Shadow that makes a hand driven by compressed air valves mounted in the wrist.

Anyone know of any other good ones?

Well, the NASA robotic hand supposedly can achieve nearly all the degrees of freedom that the human operator's hand can, and having seen this I can believe that's pretty true. Not 100% of course, but pretty darn close.

One of my friends who works in the prosthetics field was telling me about a new artificial hand in development that could potentially have very high dexterity. Remotely operated by another real hand, the hand was able to play the piano pretty well.

I think the current major issues with robotic human-like hands are getting all the control systems sorted out. Movement can be achieved with current engineering techniques for creating parts, but the dexterity requires fine motor control. That control needs sensors and such to relay positional information. Then, if strength is needed, there has to be a way to provide strength to the system without making it weight too much.

The more we advance in the areas of pneumatics and synthetic-tissues, the more we will be able to duplicate the human hand, which will probably ultimately lead to the development of a robotic clone of the human hand that can perform as well, or better.
_________________
Wolf
---------------------------------------------------------
"Be fair with others, but then keep after them until they're fair with you." Alan Alda
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Guest
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 1:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote






try a little research into nitinol.....
Back to top
rick.taiwan
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 12:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Forum Freshman
Forum Freshman

Joined: 08 Mar 2008
Posts: 8

For some tasks, nonhuman hand shapes can be more practical than human-shaped hands. The most recent winner of a certain Japan robot contest (of which I forget the name) uses a non-human gripper for "pick and place" operations.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pendragon
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 3:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Moderator
Moderator

Joined: 07 Jan 2005
Posts: 1050
Location: Nederland

rick.taiwan wrote:
For some tasks, nonhuman hand shapes can be more practical than human-shaped hands. The most recent winner of a certain Japan robot contest (of which I forget the name) uses a non-human gripper for "pick and place" operations.

True, in many ways the human hand is probably not the perfect design. Just like a human eye may be far less practical than a high-resolution camera.

But some features of 'human designs' may be quite interesting to try to imitate. For example human organs can function in a wide range of situations: the eye can combine a wide range of colours and light intensities in one picture, while a camera would average out much of the difference (that's why pictures never really look as pretty as we see the world: detail is no problem, but the range of light intensities is). The hand can carry out an amazing range of tasks, if only we learn how to perform them and coordinate our movements. And it might be useful if a robotic hand would be as adaptable as a human hand: if you consistently use your hands in a certain way, your muscles and coordination will adapt to it and become more specialized (for example my fingers are strong yet flexible as I play guitar; a miner may have much stronger but less flexible hands). But then again, the human hand can't plan how it adapts, it just reacts to stimuli; but we can plan how we'll use a machine and design it specifically for that purpose instead of letting it evolve towards it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
   Page 1 of 1

Science Forum Forum Index » Engineering & Transportation » How good are the best robotic hands these days?
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
 
 


Google
 

© 2004-2008 Thescienceforum.com

Sponsored by EnluxLED

Partner Forums
Politics Forum  Radar Detector